McCoy v. Betsey Johnson Inc.
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/14/08. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Pierce Gore (State Bar No. 128515) GORE LAW FIRM 900 East Hamilton Avenue Suite 100 Campbell, CA 95008 Telephone: (408) 879-7444 Facsimile: (408) 376-0757 Email: piercegore@gorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff ELIZABETH McCOY Michael J. Hassen (State Bar No. 124823) Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-8080 Facsimile: (800) 707-4479 Email: mjh@jmbm.com Attorneys for Defendant BETSEY JOHNSON INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ELIZABETH McCOY, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BETSEY JOHNSON INC.; Does 1 through 10, Defendants. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1), and by and through their attorneys, Plaintiff Elizabeth McCoy and Defendant Betsey Johnson, Inc. hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this entire action with prejudice. DATED: November 12, 2008 GORE LAW FIRM By: /s/ PIERCE GORE Attorney for Plaintiff ELIZABETH McCOY
Case No. C07-4782 (SC)
Case No. C07-4782 (SC) STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
DATED: November 13, 2008
JEFFER MANGELS, BUTLER& MARMARO, LLP By: /s/ MICHAEL J. HASSEN Attorneys for Defendant BETSEY JOHNSON INC. ORDER
For good cause, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
DATED: November 14, 2008
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
UNIT ED
United States District Judge
Judge S amuel C onti
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
2
A
C
LI
Case No. C07-4782 (SC)
FO
R NIA
IT IS S
O ORD
ERED
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?