Grizzle v. Horel
ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY [DOCKET NO. 39] (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 19, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. v. ROBERT HOREL, Respondent. / ELIOT SCOTT GRIZZLE, Petitioner, No. C 07-4845 SI ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY [DOCKET NO. 39] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
On March 6, 2009, petitioner filed a motion for discovery pursuant to Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. This motion is scheduled for a hearing on April 24, 2009. Petitioner is directed to file a supplemental brief, no later than March 30, 2009, to specifically address the steps petitioner has taken in state court proceedings to obtain the discovery that he now seeks. If petitioner has not made attempts to obtain the materials in state court, he must explain his reasons. Respondent shall file a response to the motion no later than April 10, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?