Zhang et al v. Tse et al

Filing 182

ORDER CLARIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/15/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

MEI-FANG LISA ZHANG, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,

No. C 07-04946 JSW

v.

ORDER CLARIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO SET
ASIDE JUDGMENT

WEI-MAN RAYMOND TSE, et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

On March 14, 2012, Defendant James Yu filed a motion to set aside the judgment in this

16

case and noticed it for hearing on April 27, 2012. Because that date was not available for

17

hearings, Defendant re-filed the motion on March 15, 2012 and set it for hearing on May 25,

18

2012. However, Defendant did not correctly enter the dates on which the opposition and reply

19

briefs are due. The Court issues this Order to clarify the correct briefing schedule. Because

20

Defendant re-filed the motion in its entirety, in accordance with Northern District Civil Local

21

Rule 7-3(a) and 7-(3)(c), the opposition brief is due on March 29, 2012 and the reply brief is

22

due on April 5, 2012.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: March 15, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

The Court notes that, in the future, if counsel needs to re-notice a hearing,
counsel should simply file a notice with a new hearing date.
1