Pina et al v. Tilton et al
ORDER: Denying 36 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. No further motions for reconsideration will be considered regarding the denial of leave to amend. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/8/2009: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PABLO P. PINA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TILTON, Director/Secretary; et al., Defendants. /
No. C 07-4989 SI (pr) ORDER
Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the court's order denying leave to amend is DENIED. (Docket # 36.) Plaintiff has not presented newly discovered evidence, has not shown a change in the law, and has not shown the court committed clear error or made a manifestly unjust decision. See McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc); School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). No further motions for reconsideration will be considered regarding the denial of leave to amend. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 6, 2009 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?