Sanrio Company, LTD. et al v. Torres et al

Filing 12

ORDER Declining to Enter Judgment(vrwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 21, 2008, the parties submitted a proposed "Final Judgment on Consent," Doc #9, which the court declined to enter for failure of the document to comply with FRCP 54(a) and 58(a). On December 22, 2008, the parties submitted a "Stipulation SANRIO COMPANY, LTD, a Japanese corporation and SANRIO, INC, a California corporation, Plaintiffs, v TORRI BUTLER TORRES, a North Carolina state resident and POSH.LIFE, an unincorporated entity, dba POST-LIFE.COM, POSHLIFEBEAUTY.COM, POSHLIFEBLING.COM and DOES 1-10, Defendants. / No C 07-05024 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and [Proposed] Final Judgment on Consent and Order Granting Permanent Injunction." Doc #11. Unfortunately, this latest submission also fails to comply with FRCP 54(a) and 58(a) and the court declines to enter it. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Counsel are advised to consult the above provisions. judgment is a "separate" document, FRCP 58(a), that does not "include recitals of pleadings * * * or a record of prior proceedings." FRCP 54(a). Counsel are directed to submit their A stipulated facts and conclusions of law and, in a separate document, a proposed form of judgment in compliance with the federal rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?