IO Group, Inc. v. Gonzales

Filing 9

IO Group, Inc. v. Gonzales

Doc. 9

Case 3:07-cv-05026-MHP

Document 9

Filed 11/05/2007

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GILL SPERLEIN (172887) THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN 584 Castro Street, Suite 849 San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: [phone] X32 Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GILBERT MICHAEL GONZALES, an individual; and DOES 1-21, individuals, Defendants.

CASE NO. C-07-5026 (MHP) DECLARATION OF GILL SPERLEIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF IO GROUP, INC.'S NOTICE MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26 CONFERENCE

I, GILL SPERLEIN, declare: 1. I am an attorney at law licensed to practice in the State of California and attorney of

record for Plaintiff Io Group, Inc. 2. Gilbert Michael Gonzales, the only named defendant in this matter has been served

a summons and complaint but has not yet appeared. The DOE defendants have not yet been identified. 3. On behalf of Io Group, Inc. I served a subpoena on Ning, Inc. requesting the ip

address and any other identifying information associated with users who engaged in the infringing

-1SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR EARLY DISCOVERY Dockets.Justi C-07-5026 (MHP)a.com

Case 3:07-cv-05026-MHP

Document 9

Filed 11/05/2007

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

acts at issue in this matter. The Clerk of the Court issued the subpoena under the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 512(h). The clerked opened a miscellaneous matter captioned In re Io Group, Inc., and assigned the number C-07-80228-MISC. On plaintiff's notice, this Court related the miscellaneous matter to this matter on October 15, 2007. 4. Ning has produced a limited response identifying ip addresses for five of the

twenty-two identified users. I am in communication with Ning, Inc.'s inside and outside counsel, who report that Ning is diligently attempting to provide a more complete list of ip addresses but has been delayed due to technical difficulties and limited resources. 5. In Ning's response to Io Group, Inc.'s subpoena, it responded that ip address

recorded for the user "titgars" on September 10, 2007 was 71.198.70.77 and that the ip address recorded for the user "serendip" on September 10, 2007 was 72.25.120.81. 6. I searched public data bases and learned that Comcast Cable Communications

controls the ip address 71.198.70.77 and that DSL Extreme controls the ip address 72.25.120.81. 7. With the court's permission, it is my intention to serve subpoenas on the Internet

access providers who control the ip addresses identified by Ning in response to the subpoena, in order to obtain account holder information for the subscribers assigned those ip addresses. 8. By indentifying the subscribers assigned the ip addresses associated with the

infringing activity, plaintiff will be able to uncover the names of the defendants previously identified as DOES 1 through 21. /// /// ///

-2SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR EARLY DISCOVERY C-07-5026 (MHP)

Case 3:07-cv-05026-MHP

Document 9

Filed 11/05/2007

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

9.

I am aware of no other procedure for discovering the names and addresses of the

DOE defendants.

Pursuant to the laws of the United States, I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: November 5, 2007

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gill Sperlein GILL SPERLEIN, Attorney for Plaintiff

-3SPERLEIN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR EARLY DISCOVERY C-07-5026 (MHP)

Case 3:07-cv-05026-MHP

Document 9

Filed 11/05/2007

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I am over 18 years of age, am employed in the county of San Francisco, at 69 Converse Street, San Francisco, California, 94110 in the office of a member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. I am readily familiar with the practice of this office for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with United Parcel Service and correspondence is deposited with United Parcel Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. Today I served the attached:
· · · PLAINTIFF'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26 CONFERENCE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; DECLARATION OF GILL SPERLEIN IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST; and DECLARATION OF KEITH RUOFF SPERLEIN IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST

by causing a true and correct copy of the above to be placed in United Parcel Service at San Francisco, California in a sealed envelope with postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Gilbert Michael Gonzales 66640 Granada Avenue Desert Hot Springs, CA 61867 United States District Court 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 e-filing Chambers Copy Io Group, Inc. v. Gonzales, C-07-5026 (MHP) I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 5, 2007. /s/ Steve Azbell Steve Azbell I hereby attest that this is the declaration of Steve Azbell and the original with Steve Azbell's holographic signature is on file for production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by any party. Pursuant to the laws of the United States, I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: November 5, 2007 /s/ Gill Sperlein GILL SPERLEIN, Counsel for Plaintiff Io Group, Inc.

-1-