Hawks v. Curry

Filing 21

ORDER Requesting Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on May 11, 2010. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HAROLD HARVEY HAWKS, Petitioner v. BEN CURRY, Respondent. / No. C 07-05039 JSW ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating to federal review of parole decisions in California. See Hayward v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010) (en banc). The Court HEREBY ORDERS the parties to submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 12 pages in length) explaining their reviews on how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole denial habeas case. The Court HEREBY ORDERS the following briefing schedule: 1. By no later than June 14, 2010, Respondent shall file a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 2. By no later than June 28, 2010, Petitioner shall file a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 11, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE