California State Foster Parent Association et al v. Wagner et al
Filing
103
ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CALIFORNIA STATE FOSTER PARENT ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA STATE CARE PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION, AND LEGAL ADVOCATES FOR PERMANENT PARENTING, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN A. WAGNER, Director of the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, in his official capacity, MARY AULT, Deputy Director of the CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, in her official capacity, Defendants. / No. C 07-05086 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER VACATING TRAIL DATE
The trial in this case is presently scheduled to begin November 17, 2008. Following the October 2008 hearing on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court issued an order granting plaintiffs' motion in part and denying it in part and denying defendants' motion. The order indicated that, in the Court's view, that order ended the case and that judgment would be entered unless the parties were to show cause why judgment should not be entered. Defendants timely filed a response to the Court's order to show cause. Plaintiffs filed a request for leave to respond to defendants' motion and a response to defendants' motion.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Plaintiffs' request for leave to respond is granted. The November 17 trial date is hereby
VACATED
pending a ruling on defendants' motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 13, 2008
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?