San Francisco Aesthetics and Laser Medicine Incorporated v. The Presidio Trust

Filing 119

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN Time for Hearing of Federal Defendants' Motion to Expand the Record 113 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 7/31/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney Northern District of California JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division CHARLES M. O'CONNOR (CSBN 56320) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor P.O. Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102-3495 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Complainant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO AESTHETICS AND LASER MEDICINE, INC. Plaintiff, v. THE PRESIDIO TRUST, et al. Defendants. __________________________________ THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant and Counter-Claimant, v. SAN FRANCISCO AESTHETICS AND LASER MEDICINE, INCORPORATED, JEANNIE TSAI, M.D. Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants. __________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 07-5170 EDL

STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING OF FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD (Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2) ORDER (Proposed)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the plaintiffs and federal defendants, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the noticed time for hearing of federal defendants' motion to expand the record for the plaintiffs' motion for de novo determination of the cross-motions to
Stipulation to Shorten Time for Hearing of Defendants' Motion to Expand the Record; Order San Francisco Aesthetics v. The Presidio Trust, et. al C 07-5170 EDL (MEJ)

enforce settlement agreement (hereafter, "Motion for De Novo Determination") may be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Stipulation to Shorten Time for Hearing of Defendants' Motion to Expand the Record; Order San Francisco Aesthetics v. The Presidio Trust, et. al C 07-5170 EDL (MEJ)

shortened to 21 days and heard on the same date as the plaintiffs' Motion for De Novo Determination, August 18, 2009. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, this stipulation is accompanied by a declaration of counsel for federal defendants setting forth the reasons and ramifications of granting this motion. This is the first request to shorten time for the federal defendants' motion to expand the record and, unless the Court orders a change, the shortening of time will not cause any change to any hearing dates or other scheduled matters in this case. A proposed order granting the requested shortening of time and including any changes to the schedule determined necessary by the Court, is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 27, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN KENT ROSE / s/ STEPHEN KENT ROSE Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: July 27, 2009

ZACKS UTRECHT & LEADBETTER / s/ PAUL F. UTRECHT Attorneys for Danielle McKinney

// // // // // // //

-2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Dated: July 27, 2009

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney / s/ CHARLES M. O'CONNOR Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Federal Defendants and Erin Magagna

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED, the federal defendants' may file their motion to expand the record by July 27, 2009. Plaintiffs' opposition to defendants' motion to expand the record will be filed not August 4 August 7 later than____________, 2009. Defendants reply, if any, may filed not later than____________, 2009. The Court will hear defendants' motion to expand the record as noticed, on August 18, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. (on ______________, 2009, at _________a.m. (p.m.))

UNIT ED

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge D

S

Dated: July 31 , 2009

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

Stipulation to Shorten Time for Hearing of Defendants' Motion to Expand the Record; Order San Francisco Aesthetics v. The Presidio Trust, et. al C 07-5170 EDL (MEJ)

A

C

LI

FO

La beth D. ge Eliza Jud

porte

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERE

NO

RT

H

-3-