San Francisco Aesthetics and Laser Medicine Incorporated v. The Presidio Trust

Filing 141

ORDER STAYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION re 123 MOTION to Enforce Judgment Notice of Request and Request for Assistance of Magistrate Judge to Resolve Parties' Dispute re Computation of Amount Due per Amended Stipulated Judgment filed by Erin Magagna, The Presidio Trust. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/16/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California SAN FRANCISCO AESTHETICS AND LASER MEDICINE INC, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. C 07-05170 EDL (MEJ) ORDER STAYING MOTION RE AMOUNT DUE UNDER AMENDED STIPULATED JUDGMENT THE PRESIDIO TRUST, et al. Defendants. _____________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 4, 2009, Defendant and Counter-Claimant United States of America and Defendant Erin Magagna filed a document entitled, "Request for Assistance of Magistrate Judge to Resolve Parties Dispute Re Computation of Amount Due Per Amended Stipulated Judgement." (Dkt. #123.) On September 18, 2009, Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, the presiding judge in this matter, issued an Order referring the Request to the undersigned for resolution and preparation of a report and recommendation. (Dkt. #128.) However, as this matter is currently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Dkt. #129), the Court finds that any order issued by this Court on Defendants' motion may become moot once the Ninth Circuit issues an opinion. Accordingly, the Court hereby STAYS Defendants' motion. The parties shall file a joint status report within 21 days of the Ninth Circuit's dispositive ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 16, 2010 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?