Candelore v. LDK Solar Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 156

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-05182-WHA Document 154 Filed 10/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SI L I C O N VA L L E Y LATHAM & WATKINS LLP James J. Farrell (Bar No. 166595) james.farrell@lw.com 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2007 Telephone: (213) 485-1234 Facsimile: (213) 891-8763 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Raymond A. Gallenberg (Bar No. 239484) ray.gallenberg@lw.com 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 328-4600 Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 Attorneys for Defendants COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C. Steven J. Toll Herbert E. Milstein Joshua S. Devore Matthew B. Kaplan hmilstein@cmht.com 1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 500, West Tower Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL, P.L.L.C. Michael Lehmann mlehmann@cmht.com One Embarcadero Center Suite 526 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 623-2048 Facsimile: (415) 433-5994 Lead Counsel for the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re LDK SOLAR SECURITIES LITIGATION ____________________________________ This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. MASTER FILE NO. C-07-05182-WHA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING [Civil L.R. 6-2(a)] 418218.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING Case 3:07-cv-05182-WHA Document 154 Filed 10/23/2008 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SI L I C O N VA L L E Y WHEREAS, the parties have, in good faith, met and conferred regarding the current briefing and hearing schedule on Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Declaration of Jane D. Nettesheim; WHEREAS, the parties previously proposed a continuance of the Hearing on the subject motions pending a mediation; WHEREAS, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Joint Declaration and in light of the Court's denial of the parties' proposed indefinite continuance of the briefing and hearing on the subject motions, the parties agree that a small amount of additional time is required to complete the briefing on the subject motions, NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that: 1. The November 13, 2008 hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Declaration of Jane D. Nettesheim is continued until November 20, 2008; 2. Plaintiff shall file his reply memorandum in further support of Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class and his opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude Declaration of Jane D. Nettesheim on or before November 3, 2008 and Defendants shall file their reply in further support of their Motion to Exclude on or before November 10, 2008; and 3. The parties respectfully submit pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a)(3) that the instant stipulated request will have no material effect on the schedule for the case. Dated: October 23, 2008 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Raymond A. Gallenberg By _____/s/ Raymond A. Gallenberg__ Attorneys for Defendants 418218.1 1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING Case 3:07-cv-05182-WHA Document 154 Filed 10/23/2008 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SI L I C O N VA L L E Y Dated: October 23, 2008 COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD, & TOLL, P.L.L.C. Matthew B. Kaplan By /s/ Matthew B. Kaplan____ Lead Counsel for the Proposed Class 418218.1 1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING Case 3:07-cv-05182-WHA Document 154 Filed 10/23/2008 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SI L I C O N VA L L E Y [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. The November 13, 2008 hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class and Defendants' Motion to Exclude Declaration of Jane D. Nettesheim is rescheduled for November 20, 2008 at 8:00 a.m.; and 2. Plaintiff shall file his reply memorandum in further support of Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class and his opposition to Defendants' Motion to Exclude Declaration of Jane D. Nettesheim on or before November 3, 2008 and Defendants shall file their reply in further support of their Motion to Exclude on or before November 10, 2008. S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED NO UNIT ED October 24 DATED: _______________, 2008 Judg _______________________________________ The Honorable William H. Alsup ER C N United States District IC T O F D I S T Judge R 418218.1 1 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING A LI FO e Willia m Alsup R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED RT H Case 3:07-cv-05182-WHA Document 154 Filed 10/23/2008 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SI L I C O N VA L L E Y CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses of the parties of record. I further certify that Service Pursuant to Local Rule 23-2 will be made electronically to: Securities Class Action Clearinghouse Att. Juan-Carlos Sanchez/Cara Mia Perlas Stanford University School of Law Crown Quadrangle Stanford, CA 94305-8612 scac@law.stanford.edu /s/ Matthew B. Kaplan Matthew B. Kaplan 418218.1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DAUBERT MOTION BRIEFING AND HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?