Friend et al v. The Hertz Corporation

Filing 112

ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from October 28, 2011 to March 30, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed no later than March 23, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 24, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 MELINDA FRIEND, JOHN NHIEU, ROBERT HIGAREDA, and BILLY HART, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 20 21 [proposed] ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE vs. 22 HERTZ CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 Case No. 3:07-cv-05222 MMC Date: October 28, 2011 Time: 10:30 a.m. Courtroom: 7 Judge: The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 25 26 27 28 [proposed] Order Granting Joint Request to Continue October 28, 2011, Case Management Conference Friend, et al. v. Hertz Corp., et al., Case No. 3:07-cv-05222 MMC 1 The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint request to continue the case management 2 conference currently scheduled for October 28, 2011. Good cause showing, the case management 3 March 30 10:30 conference is CONTINUED until _____________________, 2012, at _________ a.m./p.m. A 4 March 23 joint case management conference shall be filed no later than ___________________, 2012. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: Oct. 24 2011 ______, ______________________________________ THE HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [proposed] Order Granting Joint Request to Continue October 28, 2011, Case Management Conference Friend, et al. v. Hertz Corp., et al., Case No. 3:07-cv-05222 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?