Friend et al v. The Hertz Corporation
Filing
147
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 24, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)
1
2
3
4
JOSHUA G. KONECKY (SBN 182897)
jkonecky@schneiderwallace.com
SCHNEIDER WALLACE
COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 421-7100
Facsimile: (415) 421-7105
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
(additional counsel appear at the end of this pleading)
ROBERT A. DOLINKO (State Bar No. 076256)
rdolinko@nixonpeabody.com
NIXON PEABODY LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 984-8200
Facsimile: (415) 984-8300
Attorneys for Defendant
THE HERTZ CORPORATION
(additional counsel appear at the end of this pleading)
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
MELINDA FRIEND, JOHN NHIEU, ROBERT Case No. C:07-05222 MMC
HIGAREDA and BILLY C. HART, on behalf
of themselves, and on behalf of all others
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE
similarly situated,
WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
vs.
THE HERTZ CORPORATION,
Courtroom: 7
Judge: The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Friend, et al. v. Hertz Corp., et al., Case No. 3:07-cv-05222
1
Based upon the parties’ stipulation to dismiss the case with prejudice, IT IS HEREBY
2 ORDERED:
3
This case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs and
4 attorneys’ fees. The Court hereby retains jurisdiction solely to enforce the terms of the parties’
5 settlement should that become necessary.
6
7
8
9
Dated: February 17, 2015
February 24, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Friend, et al. v. Hertz Corp., et al., Case No. 3:07-cv-05222
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?