Friend et al v. The Hertz Corporation

Filing 147

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 24, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JOSHUA G. KONECKY (SBN 182897) jkonecky@schneiderwallace.com SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (additional counsel appear at the end of this pleading) ROBERT A. DOLINKO (State Bar No. 076256) rdolinko@nixonpeabody.com NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8200 Facsimile: (415) 984-8300 Attorneys for Defendant THE HERTZ CORPORATION (additional counsel appear at the end of this pleading) 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MELINDA FRIEND, JOHN NHIEU, ROBERT Case No. C:07-05222 MMC HIGAREDA and BILLY C. HART, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all others [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE similarly situated, WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, vs. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, Courtroom: 7 Judge: The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Friend, et al. v. Hertz Corp., et al., Case No. 3:07-cv-05222 1 Based upon the parties’ stipulation to dismiss the case with prejudice, IT IS HEREBY 2 ORDERED: 3 This case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs and 4 attorneys’ fees. The Court hereby retains jurisdiction solely to enforce the terms of the parties’ 5 settlement should that become necessary. 6 7 8 9 Dated: February 17, 2015 February 24, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Friend, et al. v. Hertz Corp., et al., Case No. 3:07-cv-05222

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?