Mead v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC. et al
Filing
165
ORDER continuing case management conference to 12/19/08 @ 2:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Illston on 10/8/08. re 164 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2008)
Case 3:07-cv-05239-SI
Document 164-2
Filed 10/07/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Jon D. Anderson (Bar No. 75694) jon.anderson@lw.com 2 Angela K. Knarr (Bar No. 216032) angie.knarr@lw.com 3 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000 4 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Telephone: (714) 540-1235 5 Facsimile: (714) 755-8290 6 Attorneys for Defendants Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC, and Retail Store Services, 7 LLC 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. C-07-5239-SI Judge: Hon. Susan Illston [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date Action Filed: October 12, 2007
11 Jennifer Meade, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on 12 behalf of the general public 13 14 v. Plaintiff,
15 Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC, Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc., 16 Retail Store Services, LLC, and KSRSS, Inc. 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
OC \938869.2
ATTORNEYS AT L A W L O S ANGELES
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case 3:07-cv-05239-SI
Document 164-2
Filed 10/07/2008
Page 2 of 2
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation to Continue Case Management
2 Conference, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 3 1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to a date
4 convenient to the Court after December 15, 2008. The date of the Case
December 19, 2008 2:30 p.m. 5 Management Conference shall be __________________________ at ________.
6 7 Dated: ________________, 2008 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTORNEYS AT L A W L O S ANGELES
______________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
OC \938869.2
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?