Wade v. City & County of San Francisco Public Defender's Office
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice; Each side to bear costs; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 4/28/2010. (Attachments: # 1 CertServ)(awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DENNIS I. FIERRERA, SLate Bar #139669 City Attorney ELIZABETH S. SALVESON, Stale Bar#83788 Chief Labor Attorney LISA B. BERKOWITZ, State Bar #167657 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza th 1390 Market Street, 5 Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3825 Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 E-Mail: email@example.com Attorneys for Defendant CITY AN]) COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO E.K. WADE Plaintiff, In Pro Per 542 North Civic Drive, Apt. D Walnut Creek, CA 94597
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALifORNIA E. K. WADE, Plaintiff, Case No. C07-5257 MHP STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE WITH MUTUAL WAIVER OF COSTS AN]) FEES FRCP, RULE 41
CITY AN]) COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Defendant.
Plaintiff in the above entitled matter hereby requests the order of the Court dismissing all claims in the above referenced case with prejudice. The parties stipuiate to the order of the Court
FRCP, Rule 41 dismissal CASE NO. C07-5257
P159 6 S6
I 2 for dismissal with mutual waiver of costs and fees. Dated:
E.K.WADE Plaintiff; In Pro Per
DENNIS.LHERRERA City Attorney ELIZABETH S. SALVESON Chief Labor Attorney LISA B. BERKOWITZ Deputy City Attorney
By: 13 14
LISA B. ERKOW1TZ
ORDER IIASED ON THE ABOVE STIPULATION, the Court hereby orders Plaintiffs entire Complaint dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees.
21 22 23 24 25
April 28, 2010
S DISTRICT TE C TA
F D IS T IC T O R
`FRCP. Rule 4 dismissal CASE NO. C07-5257
&p\ >1 B
arilyn H Judge M
HON. MARILYN H. PAUL U.S. District Court IT
RD IS SO O
RT U O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?