Epitomics, Inc v. Cell Signaling Technology, Inc

Filing 22

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 3, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 07-5275 MMC sf-2638595

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EPITOMICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

Case No.

C 07-5275 MMC

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed. R. Civ. P, and subject to approval by the Court, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Epitomics, Inc. and Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., through their undersigned attorneys of record and in accordance with

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

the terms of the parties' settlement, that this action and all claims and counterclaims therein be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit.

Respectfully submitted,

February 3, 2009

By: /s/ Matthew I. Kreeger Matthew I. Kreeger (CA SBN 153793) Jana G. Gold (CA SBN 154246) Rebecca S. Saelao (CA SBN 222731) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff EPITOMICS, INC.

February 3, 2009

By: /s/ Linda E. Rost Robert J. Goldman (CA SBN 189922) Linda E. Rost (CA SBN 211769) Kelly L. Baxter (CA SBN 232286) ROPES & GRAY LLP Attorneys for Defendant CELL SIGNALING TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 3, 2009 Dated: _____________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case No. C 07-5275 MMC
sf-2638595

2