Broyles v. A.U.L. Corporation Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan
Filing
60
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 26, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Contrary to the assertion of Broyles' counsel, neither party has filed a motion for summary judgment. Rather, on October 10, 2008, Broyles filed a "Brief in Support of Judgment," and, on October 24, 2008, Standard filed a motion to strike two declarations filed by Broyles in support of such brief. On November 10, 2008, the Court took both matters under submission. No other motions are pending in the instant action at this time.
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRICIA BROYLES, Plaintiff, v. A.U.L. CORPORATION LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, Defendant, STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest. / /
No. C-07-5305 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
United States District Court
The Court is in receipt of a letter, filed January 21, 2009 by counsel for plaintiff Patricia Broyles ("Broyles"), by which said counsel requests a Status Conference to "discuss" how the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Nolan v. Heald, No. 07-15679, 2009 WL 69238 (9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2009) "affects the motions under submission" in the instant action.1 On January 22, 2009, counsel for defendant A.U.L. Corporation Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan and real party in interest Standard Insurance Company (collectively,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
"Standard") filed a letter in opposition to the request of Broyles' counsel. Having read and considered the parties' filings, the Court finds a Status Conference is not necessary at this time. Accordingly, the request for a Status Conference is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2009
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
