Santa Fe Pointe, LP et al v. Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc. et al

Filing 149

ORDER VACATING MAY 8, 2009 HEARING; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE. The hearing scheduled for May 8, 2009 is vacated. The status conference is continued from May 8, 2009 to May 29, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 1, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is defendants Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc. and Greystone CDE, LLC's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(C)," filed March 24, 2009. Plaintiffs Santa Fe Pointe, LP, Santa Fe Management, LLC, Rant, LLC, and Theotis F. Oliphant have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Also before the Court is counterclaimant Greystone CDE, LLC's "Motion for Summary Judgment," filed March 27, 2009. Counterdefendant Theotis F. Oliphant has filed opposition, to which counterclaimant has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court deems the motions suitable for decision thereon, and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 8, 2009. // v. GREYSTONE SERVICING CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants / SANTA FE POINTE, LP, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-07-5454 MMC ORDER VACATING MAY 8, 2009 HEARING; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Further, in light of the pendency of the motions, the Court hereby CONTINUES the status conference from May 8, 2009 to May 29, 2009. A Joint Status Conference Statement shall be filed no later than May 22, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 1, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?