Santa Fe Pointe, LP et al v. Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc. et al

Filing 245

JUDGMENT. Greystone CDE, LLC shall recover from and is awarded the sum of $1,932,934.87 against Rant LLC, jointly and severally with Sante Fe Pointe, LP, Santa Fe Pointe Management, LLC, and Theotis F. Oliphant, and is entitled to recover post-judgment interest at the maximum statutory rate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 23, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SANTA FE POINTE, LP, et al., 14 Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants, 15 v. 16 17 18 19 Pursuant to this Court's Order on Counterclaimant Greystone CDE, LLC's ("Greystone 20 CDE") "Motion for Summary Judgment" (doc. # 112) that Greystone CDE had established 21 Counter-defendant Theotis Oliphant's ("Oliphant") and Santa Fe Pointe, LP ("SFP") liability on 22 Greystone CDE's counterclaims "in the event SFP has failed to repay the sums it borrowed under 23 the Loan Agreement" [Order (doc # 164) at 14:7-9]; the parties' ­ including Rant LLC's ­ 24 stipulations of June 15 and July 31, 2009 (doc. ## 185, 229); this Court's Judgments (doc. ## 190, 25 228, 232, 243) entered on June 17, July 29, August 4, October 23 and November 6, 2009; and this 26 Court's Order on Greystone CDE's "Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs Pursuant to Stipulation 27 and Judgment" (doc. # 233) that "Greystone CDE . . . is entitled to an award of attorney's fees in 28 LAI-3076156v1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) Case No. C 07-05454 MMC JUDGMENT Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney GREYSTONE SERVICING CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants and Counterclaimant. 1 Greystone CDE, LLC's Administrative Mot. for Entry of Proposed Amended Judgment C 07-05454 MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the amount of $1,271,160.00 . . . [and] an award of costs and expenses in the amount of $60,484.04" [Order (doc. # 239) at 5:25-26, 6: 18-19.], and on motion by Greystone CDE, filed November 16, 2009, to which no opposition has been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: Judgment is entered against Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Rant LLC ("Rant"), on the one hand, and in favor of Defendant/Counterclaimant Greystone CDE, LLC ("Greystone CDE") and Defendant Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc. ("Greystone Servicing"), on the other hand, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs in this action shall recover nothing from Defendants Greystone CDE and Greystone Servicing; 2. Rant, jointly and severally with Santa Fe Pointe Management, LLC (a/k/a Santa Fe Management, LLC) ("SFM"), Santa Fe Pointe, LP ("SFP"), and Theotis F. Oliphant ("Oliphant"), owes Greystone CDE $601,290.83 in unpaid principal, interest, and loan-related fees relating to a certain bridge loan, $1,271,160.00 in attorney's fees, and $60,484.04 in costs and expenses, for a total judgment of $1,932,934.87, and Judgment is entered in favor of Greystone CDE, and against Rant, jointly and severally with SFP, SFM and Oliphant, for this amount; 3. Greystone CDE shall recover from and is awarded the sum of $1,932,934.87 against Rant, jointly and severally with SFP, SFM and Oliphant, and is entitled to recover postjudgment interest from Rant, Oliphant, SFP, and SFM at the maximum statutory rate, see 28 U.S.C. § 1961, per annum until this Judgment is satisfied. 4. There being no just reason for delay, the foregoing Judgment in favor of Greystone CDE and Greystone Servicing, on the one hand, and against Rant, on the other hand, is final. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. Dated: November 23, 2009 By:_________________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge LAI-3076156v1 -2- Greystone CDE, LLC's Administrative Mot. for Entry of Proposed Amended Judgment C 07-05454 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?