Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Network Appliance, Inc.

Filing 118

ORDER Regarding Tentative Claim Construction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/14/2009. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In the December 23, 2008 Order Construing Claim Terms of the NetApp patents, the Court tentatively construed the term "storage layer underlying the block and file level servers," as "The storage layer is a software layer `below' the block and file level servers, that is, the storage layer provides operations that are used by the block and file level servers." December 23, 2008 Order at 33. The Court invited the parties to comment on the wording of the tentative construction "in case it could have any unintended consequences, in light of and without rearguing the Court's ruling on the parties' proposed constructions." Id. at 34. By letter dated January 12, 2009, NetApp proposes modifying the construction to replace the phrase "block and file level servers" with "software implementing the functions of block and file level servers." Docket no. 116. Sun objects to NetApp's proposal on the grounds that NetApp does not identify any "unintended consequences" of the Court's proposed wording, and presents new arguments without leave of Court. Docket no. 117. The Court declines to adopt NetApp's proposed construction to further construe "block and file level servers" at this time as going beyond the request by the Court regarding "unintended v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. / SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, No. C-07-05488 EDL ORDER REGARDING TENTATIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 consequences." Furthermore, Sun's request that the Court strike the last three paragraphs of NetApp's letter proposing its modified construction is denied. The Court confirms its construction. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2009 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?