Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Network Appliance, Inc.

Filing 167

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING Due Date for Reply Brief Regarding Sun Microsystems, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Document Production forn Non-party Symantec Corporation to 6/19/2009. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/15/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:07-cv-05488-EDL Document165 Filed06/11/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Meryl Macklin (CA State Bar No. 115053) meryl.macklin@hro.com HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2994 Telephone: (415) 268-2000 Facsimile: (415) 268-1999 Attorneys for Plaintiff Sun Microsystems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant CASE NO. 3:07-CV-05488-EDL C07-6053 EDL and C08-1641 EDL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DUE DATE FOR REPLY BRIEF REGARDING SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM NON-PARTY SYMANTEC CORPORATION Date: June 30, 2009 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: E, 15th Floor Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte WHEREAS, on May 22, 2009, Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun") filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition of non-party Symantec Corporation ("Motion to Compel"); WHEREAS, on June 9, 2009, Symantec Corporation ("Symantec") filed an Opposition to Sun's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition ("Symantec's Opposition Brief"); WHEREAS, pursuant to the Northern District Local Rules, Sun's Reply to Symantec's Opposition Brief shall be filed no later than June 16, 2009; 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Due Dates for Briefs and Hearing Date Regarding Sun Microsystems, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Non-Party Symantec Corporation Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Network Appliance, Inc. Case No. 3:07-cv-05488-EDL #44827 v1 saf Case3:07-cv-05488-EDL Document165 Filed06/11/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the hearing on Sun's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition of Symantec is noticed for June 30, 2009; WHEREAS, Sun has requested an extension of time to June 19, 2009 (i.e., 3 days) for Sun to file its reply in support of it Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition in order to continue its review of the documents (approximately 44,000 pages) that have been recently produced by Symantec and continue its evaluation of the need for its Motion to Compel and related hearing; WHEREAS, Sun and Symantec through undersigned counsel are continuing to meet-andconfer in good faith regarding the issues raised by the motion. THEREFORE, IT IS HERE BY STIPULATED by Sun and Symantec as follows: (1) Sun's deadline to file its reply in support of it Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Deposition is extended to June 19, 2009. HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP Dated: June 11, 2009 By: s/ Meryl Macklin Meryl Macklin Attorneys for Sun Microsystems, Inc. LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP By: s/ Carisa Yee Carisa Yee Attorneys for Non-Party, Symantec Corporation S DISTRICT TE C TA _____________________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTERED E O ORD United States Magistrate Judge IT IS S UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. June 15, 2009 RT U O S 2 ER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Due Dates for Briefs and Hearing Date Regarding Sun Microsystems, Inc.'s C N F Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Non-Party Symantec Corporation D IS T IC T O Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Network Appliance, Inc. R Case No. 3:07-cv-05488-EDL #44827 v1 saf A LI FO D. La lizabeth Judge E porte R NIA NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?