Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Network Appliance, Inc.

Filing 364

ORDER by Judge Laporte denying 318 Motion to Seal (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 27, 2010 __________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. v. NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC., Defendant. / SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, No. C-07-05488 EDL ORDER DENYING NETAPP'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL NETAPP'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,632,012 AND EXHIBIT THERETO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In connection with NetApp's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of U.S. Patent No.5,632,012 and declaration in support thereof, NetApp filed an administrative motion to file under seal the unredacted version of its Reply brief, as well as Exhibit 2 of the Walter Declaration in Support, on the basis that Sun had previously designated certain information contained in these documents "Attorney's Eyes Only." See Dkt. No. 318. On March 31, 2010, Sun filed a response stating that these documents to not need to be filed under seal. Accordingly, NetApp's Motion (Docket # 318) is DENIED and the unredacted Reply and Exhibit 2 will be made part of the public record.