Vincent v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. et al

Filing 112

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009) ).

Download PDF
Case3:07-cv-05531-SI Document111 Filed10/19/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713) JESHAWNA R. HARRELL, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 257773) PRICE AND ASSOCIATES 1611 Telegraph Avenue, Suite 1450 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 452-0292 Facsimile: (510) 452-5625 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADOLPH L. VINCENT, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTH ERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADOLPH L. VINCENT, JR. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO., RICK ) FUHRMAN, and DOES 1-15, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. C07-05531 SI STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff ADOLPH L. VINCENT, JR. and Defendants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, and RICHARD L. FUHRMAN, by and through their respective counsel of record, that they have reached settlement in this action and that the entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Dated: October 19, 2009 PRICE AND ASSOCIATES /s/ PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorney for Plaintiff ADOLPH L. VINCENT, JR. Dated: October 19, 2009 FOSTER EMPLOYMENT LAW 26 27 28 /s/ MADELYN JORDAN-DAVIS, Attorney for Defen dants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and RICHARD L. FUHRMAN -1STIPULA TED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED ORDER] (C07-05531 SI) 1164P238JRH Case3:07-cv-05531-SI Document111 Filed10/19/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:__________________ ___________________________________ HON. SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties it is hereby ordered that this matter is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1164P238JRH -2STIPULA TED DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED ORDER] (C07-05531 SI)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?