Doe v. City of San Mateo et al

Filing 201

ORDER GRANTING TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO PLAINTIFF re 195 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 2/17/09 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C 07-05596 SI No. C 08-02541 SI ORDER GRANTING TWO WEEK CONTINUANCE TO PLAINTIFF

Defendants' motions to dismiss are currently set for hearing on March 6, 2009. On February 12, 2009, plaintiff requested to continue the deadline for filing her oppositions to these motions until March 13, 2009. Defendants' motions were filed on January 15 and 16, 2009, and plaintiff's oppositions were due on February 13. Plaintiff does not explain why it was not apparent to her that she would need more time before the day before her opposition was due. She also fails to offer an adequate explanation for why she needs longer than a month to prepare her briefs. Nonetheless, because plaintiff is representing herself, the Court will grant her a continuance of two weeks. Plaintiff must file her opposition by February 27. Defendants shall file their replies by March 6. Defendants' motions shall be heard on March 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.; the March 6 hearing is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.