Doe v. City of San Mateo et al
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S RECENTLY FILED MOTIONS [Docket Nos. 259, 260] (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 15, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge v. CITY OF SAN MATEO, et al., Defendants. / JANE DOE, Plaintiff, No. C 07-05596 SI ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S RECENTLY FILED MOTIONS [Docket Nos. 259, 260] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
On March 19, 2009, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint. [Docket No. 215] Plaintiff subsequently filed seven letter briefs seeking reconsideration of various rulings in the Court's March 19 order. The Court addressed plaintiff's letter briefs in orders dated April 16 and April 29. Plaintiff has now filed two more letter briefs. This must stop. Plaintiff may not file any more motions regarding reconsideration of issues in the March 19 order, and the motions reflected in Docket Nos. 259 and 260 are DENIED . IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?