Goldsby v. Adecco, Inc

Filing 47

ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION AND CONTINUING HEARING. Defendant shall file opposition papers by November 13, 2008. Plaintiff shall file reply papers, if any, by November 24, 2008. The hearing on plaintiff's motion for class certification is continued from December 5, 2008 to December 19, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 3, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SHAVOTNAE GOLDSBY, AND ALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CV 07 5604 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION [Complaint Filed: July 26, 2007] AND CONTINUING HEARING 13 14 15 ADECCO, INC., and DOES 1 through 16 100, inclusive,, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-WEST:1RAB1\401099637.1 Defendants. -1- ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION 1 THE PARTIES HAVING STIPULATED AND AGREED to extend the 2 briefing schedule for Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion For Class Certification 3 and Plaintiff's Reply to that Opposition, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the briefing 4 schedule be amended as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Defendant shall file opposition papers by November 13, 2008. Plaintiff shall file reply papers, if any, by November 24, 2008. All other dates shall remain unchanged. SO ORDERED: The hearing on plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification is continued from December 5, 2008 to December 19, 2008. Dated: October __, 2008 13 Dated: November 3, 2008 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-WEST:1RAB1\401099637.1 By MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge -2- ORDER MODIFYING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?