Goldsby v. Adecco, Inc

Filing 50

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. The hearing on plaintiff's Motion to Modify is continued from December 5, 2008 to December 19, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 3, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff does not assert good cause exists to modify any deadline or date if her motion for class certification is not granted.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAVOTNAE GOLDSBY, Plaintiff, v. ADECCO, INC., Defendant /

No. C-07-5604 MMC ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

United States District Court

Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Modify Pretrial Preparation Order ("Motion to Modify"), filed October 31, 2008, by which plaintiff seeks to extend each remaining deadline and date, including the trial date, approximately five to six months. Defendant has not filed opposition or otherwise responded to the motion. Having read and considered the motion, the Court, as set forth below, finds it appropriate to continue the hearing on plaintiff's Motion to Modify. Plaintiff's request for a continuance is premised on the Court's granting her motion for class certification, which motion is set for hearing on December 19, 2008.1 Under such circumstances, it is premature to consider plaintiff's Motion to Modify in advance of a determination as to whether it is appropriate to certify a class, and, accordingly, the hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

on plaintiff's Motion to Modify is hereby CONTINUED from December 5, 2008 to December 19, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 3, 2008

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

2