Houtan Petroleum, Inc v. ConocoPhillips Company

Filing 163

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending time for Plaintiff to file any objections to Defendant's Bill of Costs to10/31/08. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/15/08. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thomas P. Bleau, Esq., SBN 152945 Gennady L. Lebedev, Esq., SBN 179945 BLEAU / FOX, A P.L.C. 3575 Cahuenga Boulevard West, Suite 580 Los Angeles, California 90068 Telephone : (323) 874-8613 Facsimile : (323) 874-1234 E-mail: bleaushark@aol.com E-mail: glebedev@bleaufox.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant HOUTAN PETROLEUM, INC. GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP CLEMENT L. GLYNN, Bar No. 57117 ADAM FRIEDENBERG, Bar No. 205778 One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 210-2800 Facsimile: (925) 945-1975 Email: cglynn@glynnfinley.com afriedenberg@glynnfinley.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HOUTAN PETROLEUM, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Texas ) Corporation and DOES 1 through 10, ) Inclusive ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________ ___ ) CASE NO. CV 07-05627 SC JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE ANY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 54-2; [PROPOSED] ORDER WHEREAS, on October 6, 2008, Defendant, ConocoPhillips Company filed its Bill of Costs as to Plaintiff Houtan Petroleum, Inc.. WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 54-2, Plaintiff's objections to the Bill of Costs are -1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 due on October 16, 2008. WHEREAS, the parties are in the process of settlement discussions and are hopeful they will finalize a settlement agreement within the next two weeks. WHEREFORE, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate that the time for Plaintiff to file any objections to Defendant's Bill of Costs pursuant to Local Rule 54-2 may be extended to October 31, 2008. SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 14, 2008 BLEAU / FOX, A P.L.C. //s// ____________________________________ By: Thomas P. Bleau, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Houtan Petroleum, Inc. Dated: October 14, 2008 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP //s// ____________________________________ By: Adam Friedenberg, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant ConocoPhillips Company -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO OBJECT TO BILL OF COSTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HOUTAN PETROLEUM, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Texas ) Corporation and DOES 1 through 10, ) Inclusive ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________ ___ ) CASE NO. CV 07-05627 SC [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE ANY OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 54-2 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation between the parties and for good cause, the time for Plaintiff, Houtan Petroleum, Inc., to file any objections to Defendant, ConocoPhillips Company's Bill of Costs pursuant to Local Rule 54-2, is hereby extended to October 31, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 15 Dated: October ___, 2008 25 26 27 28 -1ORDER ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO 24 Judge S R NIA 23 ERED __________________________________________ O ORD IT IS S By: Hon. Samuel Conti, United States District Court Judge uel Conti am NO UNIT ED 22 RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?