In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Filing 238

ORDER re #233 Stipulation filed by Singapore Airlines, Set/Reset Deadlines as to #233 Stipulation. Motions due by 11/17/2009.Responses due by 1/19/2010. Replies due by 2/19/2010. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/17/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS File No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB MDL No. 1913 Assigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1. The schedule for the responses of defendants Air France, Air New Zealand, All Nippon Airways, British Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd., China Airlines, Ltd., Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., EVA Airways, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, Malaysia Airlines, Philippine Airlines, Qantas Airways, SAS AB, Singapore Airlines Ltd., Thai Airways International and Vietnam Airways to the CAC, and related briefing, is as follows: November 17, 2009 January 19, 2010 February 19, 2010 Last day for defendants to file motions to dismiss and briefs in support thereof (or Answers to the CAC). Last day for plaintiffs to file briefs in opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss. Last day for defendants to file reply briefs to plaintiffs' opposition briefs. 2. The page limits for briefing on the above-listed defendants' motions to dismiss are as follows: a. Defendants intend to file a joint brief on issues common to all defendants, such joint brief not to exceed 50 pages; plaintiffs may file a brief in JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 c. b. opposition to defendants' joint brief not to exceed 50 pages; defendants may file a reply brief to plaintiffs' opposition to the joint brief not to exceed 25 pages. Defendants may file a brief or briefs in addition to the aforementioned joint brief, on issues common to more than one but less than all defendants, any such brief(s) not to exceed 20 pages; plaintiffs may file brief(s) in opposition to such additional brief(s) not to exceed 20 pages; defendants may file reply brief(s) not to exceed 10 pages. Any individual defendant may file a separate brief on issues unique to that defendant, not to exceed 10 pages; plaintiffs may file brief(s) in opposition to any such brief(s) not to exceed 10 pages; defendants may file reply brief(s) not to exceed 5 pages. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED S 17 Dated: ___________ , 2009 Sept. 17 ______________________________ CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES ERED D DISTRICT JUDGE S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case No. 3:07-cv-05634-CRB A C LI FO harles Judge C R. Brey er R NIA IT IS S O OR NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?