In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Filing
884
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu re #881 , #882 , #883 Discovery Letter Briefs.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER
AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
This Document Relates to:
ALL ACTIONS
No. C-07-05634 CRB (DMR)
ORDER RE DEPOSITION
SCHEDULING DISPUTE [DOCKET
NOS. 881, 882, 883]
12
13
___________________________________/
14
The court is in receipt of Plaintiffs and Defendant All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.’s (“ANA”)
15
letters addressing their dispute regarding whether Osame Shinobe’s deposition should take place in
16
May or June 2014. [Docket Nos. 881, 882, 883.] ANA represents that Shinobe is available for
17
deposition on June 12 or June 13 and that the U.S. embassy in Tokyo is available on those dates, and
18
Plaintiffs did not explain why waiting an additional month to depose Shinobe will result in
19
prejudice. Therefore, the court orders the parties immediately to meet and confer to confirm
20
Shinobe’s deposition for June 12 or 13 by March 25, 2014. If either Shinobe or the U.S. embassy is
21
no longer available on June 12 or 13, the deposition shall go forward on May 9, 2014 even though
22
ANA’s in-house counsel is not available then, because both Shinobe and the U.S. embassy appear
23
available on that date.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: March 24, 2014
26
27
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?