Contreras et al v. Tyco Electronics Corporation

Filing 73

ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 72 Stipulation filed by Tyco Electronics Corporation. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/14/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:07-cv-05708-CRB Document72 Filed08/13/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LLP 600 94105 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN E. HILL JOHN E. HILL (State Bar No. 45338) johnhill-law@msn.com MICHAEL P. GUTA (State Bar No. 121509) johnhill-law@msn.com 8105 Edgewater Drive, Suite 100 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: (510) 588-1000 Facsimile: (510) 729-6333 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LUIS CONTRERAS, SAUL AVILA, CARLOS JARAMILLO, PABLO REYES, SHAILENDRA SINGH, LESLIE MOORE, CARLOS GALINDO LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 088666) glafayette@lkclaw.com GLEN TURNER (State Bar No. 212417) gturner@lkclaw.com 100 Spear Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 357-4600 Facsimile: (415) 357-4605 Attorneys for Defendant TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 FAX KUMAGAI ATTORNEYS AT LAW SPEAR STREET, SUITE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAFAYETTE & 100 LUIS CONTRERAS, SAUL AVILA, CARLOS JARAMILLO, PABLO REYES, SHAILENDRA SINGH, LESLIE MOORE, CARLOS GALINDO, Plaintiffs, vs. TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; and DOES 1 through XX, Defendants. Case No. CV07-5708 CRB (JL) STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE /// /// STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV07-5708 CRB (JL) 1 Case3:07-cv-05708-CRB Document72 Filed08/13/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LLP 600 94105 WHEREAS, a settlement conference is set in this matter for August 12, 2009, at 2:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS, lead counsel for Defendant Tyco Electronics Corporation Gary Lafayette has recently learned he will be unavailable on that date due to a necessary medical procedure; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have graciously agreed to continue the Settlement Conference; and WHEREAS, the parties believe the Court is available for a Settlement Conference on September 30, 2009 at 2 p.m., and that date and time is available to the parties; IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Plaintiffs Luis Contreras, Saul Avila, Carlos Jaramillo, Pablo Reyes, Shailendra Singh, Leslie Moore and Carlos Galindo, and Defendant Tyco Electronics Corporation, through their attorneys of record herein, that the parties will reschedule the settlement conference to September 30, 2009, IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: August 13, 2009 /s/ Michael P. Guta MICHAEL P. GUTA Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Glen Turner GLEN TURNER Attorneys for Defendant ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. August 14, 2009 DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ MAGISTRATE. JUDGE JAMES LARSON 12 (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 FAX KUMAGAI ATTORNEYS AT LAW SPEAR STREET, SUITE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV07-5708 CRB (JL) LAFAYETTE & 100 DATED: August 13, 2009 2 Case3:07-cv-05708-CRB Document72 Filed08/13/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LLP 600 94105 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this document was served electronically on August 13, 2009, on counsel of record in compliance with Federal Rule 5, Local Rule 5.6 and General Order 45, by use of the Court's ECF system. /s./ Glen Turner GLEN TURNER N:\Documents\Tyco\Cont\Pldg\Stip Move SE Conf.doc 12 (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 FAX KUMAGAI ATTORNEYS AT LAW SPEAR STREET, SUITE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV07-5708 CRB (JL) LAFAYETTE & 100 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?