Plustek, Inc. v. Syscan, Inc.

Filing 47

ORDER re 45 Stipulation filed by Plustek, Inc.. Signed by Judge James Larson on 1/11/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2010)

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45

Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

SANG N. DANG (NO. 214558) [e-mail] KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP 43 Corporate Park Suite 204 Irvine, CA 92606 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 949-955-1921 Attorneys for Plaintiff PLUSTEK INC.

YUNG MING CHOU (NO. 172118) [e-mail] 39111 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 207 Fremont, CA 94538 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 510-713-8690 Attorney for Defendant SYSCAN, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PLUSTEK INC., 19 Plaintiff, 20 vs. 21 SYSCAN, INC. 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

Case No. C 07-05718 JL STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45

Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2007, Plaintiff Plustek Inc. ("Plustek") filed an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Defendant Syscan, Inc. ("Plustek"), requesting, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment that Plustek does not infringe any claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,705,124 (the "`124 Patent"), and that the `124 Patent is invalid. WHEREAS, the Court issued a Claim Construction Order on December 21, 2009 (Docket No. 44), and ordered the Parties to submit a proposed schedule for further proceedings. WHEREAS, through their respective counsel of record, the Parties have met and conferred to discuss the case schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to order the case schedule as follows:

PLEADING OR EVENT The Parties' respective Amended Infringement Contentions and Amended Invalidity Contentions (Patent L.R. 3-6) The Parties' respective Advice of Counsel (Patent L.R. 3-7) Close of fact discovery re merits of claims and defenses Initial Expert Reports on issues on which party bears the burden of proof at trial Rebuttal Expert Reports

DATE January 20, 2010 (subject to the order of the Court upon a timely showing of good cause)

February 9, 2010

March 31, 2010

May 10, 2010

June 9, 2010 August 5, 2010 August 26, 2010

24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

Close of Expert Discovery Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate Trial (last day to file)
STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

1
Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45

Filed12/30/09 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Final Pretrial Conference 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

Oppositions to Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate Trial Replies to Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate Trial Completion and Filing of Pretrial Order

September 9, 2010

September 16, 2010

TBD TBD TBD

Trial

DATED: December 30, 2009 By /s/ Yung Ming Chou Yung Ming Chou Attorneys for Defendant SYSCAN, INC. DATED: December 30, 2009 KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

By /s/ Sang N. Dang Sang N. Dang Attorneys for Plaintiff PLUSTEK INC.

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

2
Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document45

Filed12/30/09 Page4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER It is so ORDERED. January 11, 2010 DATED: _____________________ _____________________________________ U.S. CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE

3
Case No. C 07-05718 JL