Plustek, Inc. v. Syscan, Inc.

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING CASE SCHEDULE re 50 Stipulation filed by Plustek, Inc. Signed by Judge James Larson on 3/17/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2010)

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50

Filed03/16/10 Page1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

SANG N. DANG (NO. 214558) [e-mail] KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP 43 Corporate Park Suite 204 Irvine, CA 92606 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 949-955-1921 Attorneys for Plaintiff PLUSTEK INC. YUNG MING CHOU (NO. 172118) [e-mail] 39111 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 207 Fremont, CA 94538 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 510-713-8690 Attorney for Defendant SYSCAN, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PLUSTEK INC., Plaintiff, vs. SYSCAN, INC. Defendant.

Case No. C 07-05718 JL STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50

Filed03/16/10 Page2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2007, Plaintiff Plustek Inc. ("Plustek") filed an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Defendant Syscan, Inc. ("Plustek"), requesting, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment that Plustek does not infringe any claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,705,124 (the "`124 Patent"), and that the `124 Patent is invalid. WHEREAS, the Court entered a Stipulated Order Regarding Case Schedule on January 11, 2010 (Docket No. 47). WHEREAS, through their respective counsel of record, the Parties have met and conferred to discuss extending the case schedule for three (3) months to allow the Parties time to adequately prepare the case. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the Court to order the extended case schedule as follows:

PLEADING OR EVENT Close of fact discovery re merits of claims and defenses Initial Expert Reports on issues on which party bears the burden of proof at trial Rebuttal Expert Reports Close of Expert Discovery Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate Trial (last day to file) Oppositions to Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate Trial June 30, 2010

DATE

August 13, 2010

September 10, 2010 October 22, 2010 November 12, 2010

December 3, 2010

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE SCHEDULE

1

Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50

Filed03/16/10 Page3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

Replies to Dispositive Motions and Motions to Bifurcate Trial Completion and Filing of Pretrial Order Final Pretrial Conference Trial

December 17, 2010

TBD TBD TBD

DATED: March 16, 2010 By /s/ Yung Ming Chou Yung Ming Chou Attorneys for Defendant SYSCAN, INC.

DATED: March 16, 2010

KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

By /s/ Sang N. Dang Sang N. Dang Attorneys for Plaintiff PLUSTEK INC.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE SCHEDULE

2

Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50

Filed03/16/10 Page4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER It is so ORDERED. March 17, 2010 DATED: _____________________ _____________________________________ MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STIPULATION TO EXTEND CASE SCHEDULE

3

Case No. C 07-05718 JL

Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document50

Filed03/16/10 Page5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 16, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court in compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-5(b) using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of the filing to all counsel of record. /s/ Sang N. Dang Sang N. Dang

-1-

Case No. C 07-01603 JW