Plustek, Inc. v. Syscan, Inc.

Filing 57

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Larson on 6/28/10. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document56 Filed06/25/10 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SANG N. DANG (SBN. 214558) sdang@koslaw.com KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP 43 Corporate Park, Suite 204 Irvine, CA 92606 Telephone: 949-955-1920 Facsimile: 949-955-1921 Attorneys for Plaintiff PLUSTEK INC. YUNG MING CHOU, ESQ (SBN 172118) chouyung@aol.com 39111 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 207 Fremont, CA 94538 Tel.: (510) 713-8698 Fax: (510) 713-8690 Attorney for Defendant SYSCAN, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PLUSTEK INC. Case No.: C07-05718 JL Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL vs. SYSCAN, INC. Defendants. [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (C 07-05718 JL) Case3:07-cv-05718-JL Document56 Filed06/25/10 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Having entered an agreement to settle the above-captioned action, Plaintiff Plustek, Inc. and Defendant Syscan, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as the "Parties") hereby enter into this Stipulation of Dismissal. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties agree to dismiss the above-captioned action without prejudice. The Parties further agree that each side is to bear its own fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 25, 2010 KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP By: /s/ Sang N. Dang Sang N. Dang Attorneys for Plaintiff PLUSTEK, INC. YUNG MING CHOU, ESQ. By: /s/ Yung-Ming Chou Yung Ming Chou Attorney for Defendant SYSCAN, INC. UNIT ED 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 June 28, 2010 S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (C 07-05718 JL) A C LI FO me Judge Ja s Larson R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?