Ruiz v. Gap, Inc.

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER re Case Management and Order. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 12/19/08. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 ROSEMARY M. RIVAS (CA SBN 209147) MARK PUNZALAN (CA SBN 247599) FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 100 Bush Street, Suite 1450 San Francisco, CA, 95104 Telephone: 415.3988.8700 Facsimile: 415.3988.8704 E-mail: rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 6 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 GAP, INC., and DOES 1-9 inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re Case Management and Order Case No. C 07-5739 SC sf-2618058 WILLIAM L. STERN (CA SBN 96105) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 E-mail: wstern@mofo.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GAP INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JOEL RUIZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. C 07-5739 SC STIPULATION RE CASE MANAGEMENT AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The existing scheduling order, entered October 2, 2008 (Docket #75, 2:5-9), continued Plaintiff's motion for class certification and Defendant's motion for summary judgment from December 5, 2008 to February 6, 2009. Under this schedule, the parties' opening briefs are due January 2, 2009. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. On November 26, 2008, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint, scheduled for January 23, 2009. (Docket #77, 81.) Plaintiff seeks leave to name an additional defendant, to add a new claim, and to reinstate a claim for violation of the Unfair Competition Law, California Business & Professions Code 17200, et seq. ("UCL"). Defendant intends to oppose the motion. 3. This timing means that, as scheduled, the parties' motions for class certification and summary judgment would be filed in reference to an original Complaint (Docket #1) that may be superseded by a later First Amended Complaint. The parties believe that the Court and the parties would be better served by directing class certification and summary judgment to the First Amended Complaint, assuming leave to file is granted. To do that, however, those motions will need to be continued. Additionally, Defendant's counsel has a scheduling conflict on February 6, 2009. 4. The parties respectfully request that, for good cause shown, the Court vacate the February 6, 2009 hearing date and reschedule that hearing to March 20, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. This request does not affect the discovery cutoff currently set for December 23, 2008. // // // // // // // // // // // // // Stipulation re Case Management and Order Case No. C 07-5739 SC sf-2618058 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 18, 2008 BEN BARNOW, PRO HAC VICE BARNOW AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. MILA F. BARTOS FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP (WASHINGTON D.C.) ROSEMARY M. RIVAS FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP By /s/ Rosemary M. Rivas Rosemary M. Rivas Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff JOEL RUIZ Dated: December 18, 2008 WILLIAM L. STERN MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By /s/ William L. Stern William L. Stern Attorneys for Defendant GAP INC. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the briefing schedule set forth in the Court's order dated October 2, 2208 (Docket #75) is hereby vacated, that Plaintiff's motion to certify the class and Defendants' motion for summary judgment is continued until Friday, March 20, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. The briefing schedule for these motions shall run from the new hearing date in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S Dated: December19, 2008 ER N F D IS T IC T O R Stipulation re Case Management and Order Case No. C 07-5739 SC sf-2618058 A C LI FO Honorable Samuel Conti NORTHERN DISTRICTl Conti CALIFORNIA OF e a Judge S mu R NIA O IT IS S ORDER ED NO RT H 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?