Johnson v. Chevron Corporation et al
Filing
454
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 450 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/23/2013)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
No. C 07-5756 SI
SAMUEL B JOHNSON III,
7
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Plaintiff,
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
v.
CHEVRON CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
/
11
12
This case was closed on May 20, 2009. Plaintiff has now filed an administrative motion to seal
13
certain documents filed in this case years ago. Defendants have opposed the motion. Having considered
14
the parties’ arguments and the material submitted, the Court finds that plaintiff has not shown good
15
cause for these documents to be sealed.
16
Plaintiff seeks to seal dozens of documents that he “inadvertently” filed over the course of this
17
case, which contain information and allegations about his medical conditions that gave rise to his
18
various disability-related claims. Bernard Decl. ¶ 8. The Court rejects plaintiffs assertion. The
19
information he now seeks to seal was intentionally filed: it formed the “entire basis for plaintiff’s
20
disability claim,” see Dkt. 132, and he included it repeatedly in filings throughout this case. Morever,
21
the Court has previously rejected plaintiff’s request to seal such information. See Dkts. 118, 132.
22
Plaintiff’s current motion is no different; it does not establish why the Court should seal the information
23
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to file under seal is hereby DENIED.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 23, 2013
26
27
28
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?