Briggs v. United States of America et al

Filing 239

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY'S FEES AND/OR CY PRES DISTRIBUTION AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CY PRES DISTRIBUTION by Judge William Alsup [granting in part and denying in part 238 Motion to Amend/Correct]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL ATTORNEY’S FEES AND/OR CY PRES DISTRIBUTION AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CY PRES DISTRIBUTION / 13 14 No. C 07-05760 WHA JULIUS BRIGGS, On February 14, an order issued denying plaintiff’s motion for additional attorney’s fees 15 and/or cy pres distribution and granting defendant’s motion for cy pres distribution and 16 requested counsel vet the proposed distribution procedures set forth at the end of said order. 17 Class counsel accordingly filed an administrative motion highlighting two issues and proposing 18 changes to the distribution, which the government agreed it would not oppose (Vishner Decl. 19 ¶ 3). The Court thanks class counsel its submission. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Court partially agrees with class counsel and orders the following amendment to the order dated February 14 (Dkt. No. 237): Page 8, ¶ 5 shall now read: 5. That, upon transfer of the uncashed check funds listed above in (4), KCC transfer the remaining $140,000 in awarded attorney’s fees and interest accrued on awarded fees according to the direction of class counsel;” IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: February 22, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?