Chairez v. Adams
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of M. Adams against Arturo Chairez. The Court finds the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and hereby GRANTS respondents motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the petition is hereby DISMISSED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deputy Clerk Dated: February 9, 2009 v. M. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. / ARTURO CHAIREZ, Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. CV-07-5767 MMC (PR) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Court finds the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and hereby GRANTS respondent's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the petition is hereby DISMISSED.
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Tracy Lucero
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?