Chairez v. Adams

Filing 23

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of M. Adams against Arturo Chairez. The Court finds the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and hereby GRANTS respondents motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the petition is hereby DISMISSED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Deputy Clerk Dated: February 9, 2009 v. M. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. / ARTURO CHAIREZ, Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. CV-07-5767 MMC (PR) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Court finds the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), and hereby GRANTS respondent's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the petition is hereby DISMISSED.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Tracy Lucero