Edwards v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 71

ORDER granting additional time. The parties are directed to file a Stipulation of Dismissal or, in the alternative, a status update explaining why a stipulation of dismissal has not been filed, by December 19, 2008. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. (14) days. On November 21, 2008, and again on December 5, 2008, the plaintiff in the above-captioned matter requested an additional fourteen (14) days to finalize the settlement agreement and file a stipulation for dismissal. Docs ##69, 70. Initially, the parties ELIZABETH E EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; THE HF AHMANSON & COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN; et al, Defendant. / No C-07-5807 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA had intended to file a stipulation for dismissal by November 20, 2008. Doc #68. The court GRANTS the request for an additional fourteen The parties are directed to file either a stipulation for dismissal or a status update explaining why a stipulation has not been filed by December 19, 2008.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?