The Tonytail Company, Inc. v. Conair Corporation et al

Filing 102

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 30, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Matlock Law Group, PC.

ANNE-LEITH MATLOCK MATLOCK LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation 1485 Treat Blvd., Suite 200 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC. THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-853-1038 E-Mail: [e-mail] ELEANOR M. HYNES (Pro Hac Vice) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 202-346-4444 Email: [e-mail] Attorneys For Defendants CONAIR CORPORATION and RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC. a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CONAIR, a Delaware Corporation; SCUNCI INTL., Ltd., a Delaware Corporation; RITE AID, a Delaware Corporation; L&N Sales & Marketing, Inc., and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05895-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case No.3:07-cv-05895-WHA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Matlock Law Group, PC.

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Plaintiff The Tonytail Company, Inc. and Defendants Conair Corporation and Rite Aid HDQTRS. Corp, pursuant to the stipulation executed by the parties and submitted to this Court, and for other good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) (2) all of Plaintiff's causes of action are hereby dismissed with prejudice; Defendants' counterclaims with respect to non-infringement are dismissed

prejudice; (3) Defendants' counterclaims with respect to invalidity are dismissed

without prejudice; (4) within 30 days of this stipulation, either party may file an Order to Show

Cause setting forth why this lawsuit should be reinstated.
S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

UNIT ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

Case No.3:07-cv-05895-WHA

A

LI

September 30, 2008. Dated: _________________

_______________________ ER WILLIAM ALSUPF C N O D IS RICT United StatesTDistrict Court Judge Northern District of California San Francisco Division
RT
H

FO

Judge W

illiam A

lsup

R NIA

IT IS S

ERED O ORD

NO