The Tonytail Company, Inc. v. Conair Corporation et al
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS 4 AND 5 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,263,884. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 10, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Matlock Law Group, PC.
ANNE-LEITH MATLOCK MATLOCK LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation 1485 Treat Blvd., Suite 200 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Phone: (925) 944-7131 Fax: (925) 944-7138 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Plaintiff THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC. THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: 650-752-3100 Facsimile: 650-853-1038 E-Mail: TFitzpatrick@goodwinprocter.com Attorneys For Defendants CONAIR CORPORATION and RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION THE TONYTAIL COMPANY, INC. a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CONAIR, a Delaware Corporation; SCUNCI INTL., Ltd., a Delaware Corporation; RITE AID, a Delaware Corporation; L&N Sales & Marketing, Inc., and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 3:07-cv-05895-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS 4 AND 5 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,263,884
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Plaintiff The Tonytail Company, Inc. and Defendants Conair Corporation and Rite Aid HDQTRS. Corp, pursuant to the stipulation executed by the parties and submitted to this Court, and for other good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) all of Plaintiff's causes of action with respect to claims 4 and 5 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,263,884, are hereby dismissed with prejudice; (2) Defendants' counterclaim requesting a declaratory judgment of non-
infringement with respect to claims 4 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,884 is dismissed with prejudice; (3) Defendants' counterclaim requesting a declaratory judgment of invalidity
with respect to claims 4 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,884 is dismissed without prejudice; and (4) neither party will assert a cause of action against the other (or any related
entity, affiliate, assignee, or successor) based in whole or part on the infringement, non-infringement, or invalidity of claims 4 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,884.
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Matlock Law Group, PC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 10, 2008. Dated: _________________
lsup _______________________ illiam A Judge W WILLIAM ALSUP ER C United States District Court Judge N F D IS T IC T O R California Northern District of San Francisco Division
ERED O ORD IT IS S
RT U O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?