Crago, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD. et al

Filing 5208

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 5207 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 5191 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court as to the Irico Defendants (filed pursuant to Order ECF No. 5187) for new briefing schedule filed by Irico Group Corp., Irico Group Corporation, Irico Group Electronics Co., Ltd., Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 13, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Gerald F. George (CA State Bar No. 142573) geraldgeorge@dwt.com DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Carl W. Oberdier (pro hac vice) cwo@oberdier.com Kellen G. Ressmeyer (pro hac vice) kgr@oberdier.com Sara K. Hunkler (pro hac vice) skh@oberdier.com OBERDIER RESSMEYER LLP 655 Third Avenue, 28th Floor New York, New York 10017 Attorneys for Defendants IRICO GROUP CORP. and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD. [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Case No.: 3:07−cv−05944−JST MDL No.: 1917 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 21 22 23 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191) 24 25 Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. 26 and Irico Group Corporation (together, “Irico”), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby 27 stipulate as follows: 28 STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191) MDL NO. 1917 │ 3:07-cv-05944 JST 1 WHEREAS, on August 14, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an Application For Default Judgment By 2 The Court Against The Irico Defendants (the “Default Judgment Application”) (MDL Dkt. No. 3 5191); 4 WHEREAS, on August 22, 2017, the Court entered its Order providing that Irico would 5 6 have two weeks from Plaintiffs’ filing on the docket of a proof of service of the Default Judgment 7 Application to file a response, and Plaintiffs would have one additional week to file a reply brief 8 (MDL Dkt. No. 5196); 9 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed such proof of service on August 30, 2017 (MDL Dkt. No. 5199); 11 WHEREAS, new undersigned counsel for Irico filed notices of appearances and/or 12 13 motions for admission pro hac vice on September 8, 2017 (MDL Dkt. Nos. 5200-5203); WHEREAS, Irico’s counsel needs a reasonable period of time to become familiar with 14 15 the issues in the case and prepare a response to the Default Judgment Application; and 16 17 18 WHEREAS, Irico’s counsel has conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel and obtained Plaintiffs’ consent to an extension of Irico’s time to respond to the Default Judgment Application until October 4, 2017. Plaintiffs do not concede that Irico has an unlimited right to respond 19 substantively to the issues raised by Plaintiffs’ application for a default and/or to submit evidence 20 21 or argument in response to that submitted by Plaintiffs. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Irico and 22 23 Plaintiffs, that: 24 25 26 Irico’s response to the Default Judgment Application shall be due on or before October 4, 2017; Plaintiffs’ reply in further support of their Default Judgment Application shall be due on 27 or before October 11, 2017; and 28 2 STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191) MDL NO. 1917 │ 3:07-cv-05944 JST 1 2 3 4 The Court shall re-set the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Default Judgment Application at its convenience. shall be held on November 16, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. September 13, 2017 Dated: ______________ _____________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 Dated: September 12, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gerald F. George Gerald F. George (CA State Bar No. 142573) geraldgeorge@dwt.com DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 19 /s/ R. Alexander Saveri Guido Saveri (22349) guido@saveri.com R. Alexander Saveri (173102) rick@saveri.com Geoffrey C. Rushing (126910) grushing@saveri.com Cadio Zirpoli (179108) cadio@saveri.com Matthew D. Heaphy (227224) mheaphy@saveri.com SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. 706 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 217-6810 Facsimile: (415) 217-6813 20 Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Carl W. Oberdier (pro hac vice) cwo@oberdier.com Kellen G. Ressmeyer (pro hac vice) kgr@oberdier.com Sara K. Hunkler (pro hac vice) skh@oberdier.com OBERDIER RESSMEYER LLP 655 Third Avenue, 28th Floor New York, New York 10017 Telephone: (212) 659-5141 Facsimile: (646) 349-4925 21 22 Attorneys for Defendants Irico Group Corp. And Irico Display Devices Co., Ltd. 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 27 28 3 STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY THE COURT AGAINST THE IRICO DEFENDANTS (MDL DKT NO. 5191) MDL NO. 1917 │ 3:07-cv-05944 JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?