Brantley et al v. Boyd et al

Filing 302

ORDER GRANTING LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR. AND ELLEN BRANTLEY PERMISSION TO RECEIVE SEALED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT. Signed by Judge Bernard Zimmerman on October 2, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP FREDERICK BROWN, SBN 65316 FBrown@gibsondunn.com LINDSEY E. BLENKHORN, SBN 227484 LBlenkhorn@gibsondunn.com ALLISON C. KOP, SBN 267074 AKop@gibsondunn.com EMILY L. FEDMAN, SBN 264973 EFedman@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 986-5309 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR. and ELLEN BRANTLEY 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR. AND ELLEN BRANTLEY PERMISSION TO RECEIVE SEALED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT Plaintiffs, 16 17 CASE NO. C 07-06139 NC LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR., ELLEN BRANTLEY, v. GARRETT BOYD, SERGEI KLYAZMIN, MODO REALTY and ROYAL CROWN MORTGAGE, PRAVEEN CHANDRA, ACADEMY ESCROW, SCHWARTZ & FENSTER P.C., Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR. AND ELLEN BRANTLEY PERMISSION TO RECEIVE SEALED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT – CASE NO. C 07-06139 NC 1 It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ counsel shall be permitted to receive copies of the 2 sealed portions of the written transcripts of the September 27, 2012 Settlement Conference hearing. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: September __, 2012 October 2, 2012 By: Honorable Bernard Zimmerman, U.S.M.J. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LARRY TYRONE BRANTLEY, SR. AND ELLEN BRANTLEY PERMISSION TO RECEIVE SEALED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT– CASE NO. C 07-06139 NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?