Brantley et al v. Boyd et al

Filing 330

***Please disregard. Entered in error.***

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

STEPHEN B. TURNER,
No. C 12-6231 MMC
Plaintiff,

11
v.

ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER

12
DUSTIN TIERNEY,
13

Defendant.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/

Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order, filed July 12, 2013. The
motion is not filed in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of this District, which require the
moving party to notice any such motion for hearing on a date no earlier than thirty-five days
from the date the motion is filed. See Civil L.R. 7-2.
In the interests of time, the Court hereby SETS the hearing on said motion for
Friday, August 16, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff is hereby ADVISED that any future motion he files must be in compliance
with the Civil Local Rules as set forth above, and that a failure to comply will result in the
motion being stricken.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge