Eichenholtz v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 180

STIPULATION AND ORDER allowing defendants to file a reply brief, not to exceed 20 pages; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 3/17/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146) ([e-mail]) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) ([e-mail]) Scott C. Hall (SBN 232492) ([e-mail]) Sverker K. Hogberg (SBN 244640) ([e-mail]) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC., DOUGLAS G. BERGERON, WILLIAM G. ATKINSON and CRAIG A. BONDY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Master File No. CV 07-6140 MHP CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF LENGTH Judge: The Hon. Marilyn H. Patel Courtroom: 15 Hearing Date: April 20, 2009 Hearing Time: 2:00 p.m.

1
STIPULATION REGARDING REPLY BRIEF LENGTH CASE NO. CV 07-6140 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Whereas, on December 31, 2008, Defendants VeriFone Holdings, Inc., Douglas Bergeron, William Atkinson and Craig Bondy filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint ("VeriFone Motion to Dismiss"); Whereas, on December 31, 2008 Defendant Barry Zwarenstein filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint ("Zwarenstein Motion to Dismiss"); Whereas, on February 17, 2009, the parties agreed and stipulated to permit Plaintiff to file a combined omnibus brief in opposition to the VeriFone Motion to Dismiss and the Zwarenstein Motion to Dismiss, not to exceed forty (40) pages, rather than filing two briefs of twenty-five (25) pages; Whereas, on February 20, 2009, Plaintiff filed its omnibus opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss ("Plaintiff's Opposition"); Whereas, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(c), Defendants VeriFone, Bergeron, Atkinson and Bondy are permitted to file a reply brief or memorandum in response to Plaintiff's Opposition, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages of text; Whereas, Plaintiff has agreed that it has no objection to Defendants VeriFone, Bergeron, Atkinson and Bondy filing a reply brief not to exceed twenty (20) pages of text. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: The reply brief of Defendants VeriFone, Bergeron, Atkinson and Bondy will not exceed twenty (20) pages of text. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 16, 2009 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP CHRISTOPHER P. SEEFER ELI R. GREENSTIEN /s/ Eli R. Greenstein 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415/288-4534 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 2
STIPULATION REGARDING REPLY BRIEF LENGTH CASE NO. C 07-6140 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Dated: March 16, 2009

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP BRENDAN P. CULLEN SCOTT C. HALL /s/ Brendan P. Cullen 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303-3308 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650/461-5700 Attorneys for Defendants VeriFone Holdings, Inc., Douglas Bergeron, William Atkinson and Craig Bondy

I, Brendan P. Cullen, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF LENGTH. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Eli. R. Greenstein concurred in this filing. /s/ Brendan P. Cullen

3
STIPULATION REGARDING REPLY BRIEF LENGTH CASE NO. C 07-6140 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

ORDER

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT ED

3/17/2009 Dated: _______________________

________________________________________ THE HONORABLE MARILYN H. PATEL ED UNITED STATES DISTRICTRE O ORD JUDGE

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

4
STIPULATION REGARDING REPLY BRIEF LENGTH CASE NO. C 07-6140 MHP

A

C

LI

FO

arily Judge M

n H. Pa

tel

R NIA

IT IS S

NO

RT

H