Thomas Weisel Partners LLC et al v. BNP Paribas et al

Filing 184

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline for depositions to 3/24/2010; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/27/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2010)

Download PDF
1 JOSEPH E. ADDIEGO III (State Bar No. 169522) SAM N. DAWOOD (State Bar No. 178862) 2 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 3 San Francisco, California 94111-6533 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 4 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 joeaddiego@dwt.com 5 STEVEN T. COTTREAU (admitted pro hac vice) 6 CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP 2001 K Street NW 7 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 912-5000 8 Facsimile: (202) 912-6000 steve.cottreau@cliffordchance.com 9 Attorneys for Defendants 10 BNP PARIBAS and BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES (ASIA) LIMITED 11 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 THOMAS WEISEL PARTNERS LLC, a 17 Delaware limited liability company, and THOMAS WEISEL INTERNATIONAL 18 PRIVATE LIMITED, an Indian company, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 22 BNP PARIBAS, a French corporation, BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES (ASIA) LIMITED, a 23 Hong Kong company, and PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTY, an individual, 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. CV-07-06198 MHP Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-07-06198 MHP STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (L.R. 6-2) Trial Date: August 17, 2010 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 2 parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that, if the Court approves, the current 3 discovery deadline in the above-captioned case be extended as set forth below. The stipulation is 4 based on the following: 5 The current discovery schedule has been set in a series of agreements and court orders. On 6 November 18, 2008, the parties in the above-captioned action filed a Discovery Plan pursuant to 7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) setting forth, among other things, discovery deadlines. On 8 February 9, 2009, the parties appeared for a Status Conference and the Court issued Amended 9 Civil Minutes setting discovery deadlines and a trial date. On June 12, 2009, the Court entered an 10 Order granting the stipulated request of the parties to reset the trial deadlines and trial date in the 11 above-captioned action. On October 5, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting the stipulated 12 request of the parties to reset the discovery deadlines and trial date in the above-captioned action. 13 On January 4, 2010, the Court entered an Order granting the stipulated request of the parties to 14 reset the discovery deadlines and trial date in the above-captioned action. On January 13, 2010, 15 the Court entered an Order granting the stipulated request of the parties to reset the deadline for 16 depositions in the above-captioned action. 17 The parties have agreed to extend the discovery schedule for the limited purpose of 18 completing the deposition of Thomas W. Weisel. The extension is necessary because the witness 19 is not available at a time convenient for all parties prior to the current deadline for completing 20 depositions. 21 The parties seek Court approval to further extend the discovery deadline for depositions 22 from February 4, 2010 to March 24, 2010 for the purpose of completing the deposition of Mr. 23 Weisel. 24 25 26 In all other respects, the Court's prior scheduling orders shall remain unchanged. The parties respectfully request that the Court grant their request. In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X regarding signatures, the filer of this 27 document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document was obtained from each of 28 the signatories listed below. 2 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. CV-07-06198 MHP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. CV-07-06198 MHP DATED: January 26, 2010 Respectfully, STEVEN T. COTTREAU CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP SO STIPULATED By: /s/ STEVEN T. COTTREAU STEVEN T. COTTREAU Attorneys for Defendants BNP PARIBAS and BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES (ASIA) LIMITED RAGESH K. TANGRI JOHANNA CALABRIA DURIE TANGRI LLP SO STIPULATED By: /s/ JOHANNA CALABRIA JOHANNA CALABRIA Attorneys for Defendant PRAVEEN CHAKRAVARTY GILBERT R. SEROTA CLARA J. SHIN MICHAEL L. GALLO HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation SO STIPULATED By: /s/ GILBERT R. SEROTA GILBERT R. SEROTA Attorneys for Plaintiffs THOMAS WEISEL PARTNERS LLC and THOMAS WEISEL INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, the foregoing is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED ER N D IS T IC T R OF 4 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. CV-07-06198 MHP A C LI FO arilyn Judge M l H. Pate R NIA __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE MARILYN HALLD PATEL RE ORD JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICTE IS SO S 27 4 DATED: January ___, 2010 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O IT NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?