v. Foulk et al

Filing 59

USCA ORDER (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2009)

Case: 09-72885

11/17/2009

Page: 1 of 2

DktEntry: 7133274

F IL E D
U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 17 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

In re: DANNY ATTERBURY.

N o . 09-72885 D .C . No. 3:07-cv-06256-MHP N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco

D A N N Y ATTERBURY, Petitioner,

ORDER v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, E D FOULK; et al., Real Parties in Interest.

B efo re: WARDLAW, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
AT/MOATT

Case: 09-72885

11/17/2009

Page: 2 of 2

DktEntry: 7133274

N o motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, or any other su b m issio n s shall be filed or entertained in this closed docket.

AT/MOATT

2

0 9 -7 2 8 8 5