v. Foulk et al
USCA ORDER (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2009)
Page: 1 of 2
F IL E D
U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 17 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S
In re: DANNY ATTERBURY.
N o . 09-72885 D .C . No. 3:07-cv-06256-MHP N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco
D A N N Y ATTERBURY, Petitioner,
ORDER v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, E D FOULK; et al., Real Parties in Interest.
B efo re: WARDLAW, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
Page: 2 of 2
N o motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, or any other su b m issio n s shall be filed or entertained in this closed docket.
0 9 -7 2 8 8 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?