Smith et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 97

ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS, DUE TO CONTINGENT SETTLEMENT OF FEE CLAIM signed by Judge Illston on 2/17/12 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)

Download PDF
4 JOHN L. BURRIS (State Bar No. 69888) BENJAMIN NISENBAUM (State Bar No. 222173) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114) JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268) GINA ALTOMARE (State Bar No. 273099) HADDAD & SHERWIN 505 Seventeenth Street Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 452-5500 Fax: (510) 452-5510 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 JAMES TAYLOR, et. al., Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 CITY OF OAKLAND, et. al., Defendants, 17 18 19 AND ALL RELATED CASES SMITH, et. al., 20 21 22 23 Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. 24 25 (Case No. C-07-6298 SI) 26 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Related Case No. C-04-4843 SI Hon. Susan Illston STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES in Smith v. City of Oakland, No. C-07-6298 SI (Plaintiffs Spencer Troy Lucas and Kirby Bradshaw) DUE TO CONTINGENT SETTLEMENT OF FEE CLAIM 27 28 No. C-07-6298 SI: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES 1 1 All parties in the cases tried in Smith v. City of Oakland, No. C-07-6298 SI (Plaintiffs 2 Spencer Troy Lucas and Kirby Bradshaw v. City of Oakland and Officer Ingo Mayer), by and 3 4 through their respective counsel, hereby inform the court that they have agreed to a tentative settlement of all claims for fees and costs in this particular case, subject to approval by the Oakland 5 6 7 City Council. Currently, the deadline for filing the fee motion is March 1, 2012. To avoid the need to incur unnecessary fees and costs while this tentative settlement is under 8 consideration by the City Counsel, the parties stipulate, and request this Court to order, that 9 Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs may be filed on or before June 1, 2012. 10 11 DATED: February 15, 2012 HADDAD & SHERWIN 12 By:/s/ Michael J. Haddad__________ Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 15 DATED: February 16, 2012 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 16 17 By: /s/ Randolph Hall____________ Attorneys for Defendant City of Oakland 18 19 20 DATED: February 16, 2012 BURNHAM BROWN 21 22 23 By: /s/ John J. Verber____________ Attorneys for Defendant Officer Ingo Mayer 24 25 26 27 28 No. C-07-6298 SI: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES 2 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and their contingent settlement of Plaintiffs’ claims for 3 reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable 4 attorneys’ fees and costs may be filed on or before June 1, 2012. 5 6 7 8 Dated: _________________, 2012. 2/17 _________________________________________ HON. SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C-07-6298 SI: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?