Smith et al v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
97
ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS, DUE TO CONTINGENT SETTLEMENT OF FEE CLAIM signed by Judge Illston on 2/17/12 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)
4
JOHN L. BURRIS (State Bar No. 69888)
BENJAMIN NISENBAUM (State Bar No. 222173)
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)
JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)
GINA ALTOMARE (State Bar No. 273099)
HADDAD & SHERWIN
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 452-5500
Fax: (510) 452-5510
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
JAMES TAYLOR, et. al.,
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
16
CITY OF OAKLAND, et. al.,
Defendants,
17
18
19
AND ALL RELATED CASES
SMITH, et. al.,
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
Defendants.
24
25
(Case No. C-07-6298 SI)
26
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Related Case No. C-04-4843 SI
Hon. Susan Illston
STIPULATION AND
(PROPOSED) ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR
FILING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR REASONABLE
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND
EXPENSES in Smith v. City of
Oakland, No. C-07-6298 SI
(Plaintiffs Spencer Troy Lucas and
Kirby Bradshaw) DUE TO
CONTINGENT
SETTLEMENT OF FEE
CLAIM
27
28
No. C-07-6298 SI: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
1
1
All parties in the cases tried in Smith v. City of Oakland, No. C-07-6298 SI (Plaintiffs
2
Spencer Troy Lucas and Kirby Bradshaw v. City of Oakland and Officer Ingo Mayer), by and
3
4
through their respective counsel, hereby inform the court that they have agreed to a tentative
settlement of all claims for fees and costs in this particular case, subject to approval by the Oakland
5
6
7
City Council. Currently, the deadline for filing the fee motion is March 1, 2012.
To avoid the need to incur unnecessary fees and costs while this tentative settlement is under
8
consideration by the City Counsel, the parties stipulate, and request this Court to order, that
9
Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs may be filed on or before June 1, 2012.
10
11
DATED: February 15, 2012
HADDAD & SHERWIN
12
By:/s/ Michael J. Haddad__________
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
15
DATED: February 16, 2012
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
16
17
By: /s/ Randolph Hall____________
Attorneys for Defendant
City of Oakland
18
19
20
DATED: February 16, 2012
BURNHAM BROWN
21
22
23
By: /s/ John J. Verber____________
Attorneys for Defendant
Officer Ingo Mayer
24
25
26
27
28
No. C-07-6298 SI: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
2
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and their contingent settlement of Plaintiffs’ claims for
3
reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs’ motion for reasonable
4
attorneys’ fees and costs may be filed on or before June 1, 2012.
5
6
7
8
Dated: _________________, 2012.
2/17
_________________________________________
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No. C-07-6298 SI: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?