McDermott v. Potter et al
PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/28/09. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/29/2009: # 2 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: May 29, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the conference. DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is September 30, 2009. DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 10/1/09; REBUTTAL: 10/19/09. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2). EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is October 30, 2009. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by January 29, 2010; Opp. Due February 12, 2010; Reply Due February 19, 2010; and set for hearing no later than March 5, 2010 at 9:00 AM. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: April 6, 2010 at 3:30 PM. JURY TRIAL DATE: April 19,2 010 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor. TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days. v. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant. / JUDY A. MCDERMOTT, Plaintiff, No. C 07-06300 SI PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER
SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS: The parties shall participate in an ADR telephone conference before May 15, 2009. Rule 26 initial disclosures shall be produced by May 26, 2010. Defendant's Motion for More Definate Statement is continued to May 29, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case, including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action. Dated:
SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?