Gaytan v. Chao

Filing 36

ORDER re 17 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff ordered to submit response to motion to dismiss within fourteen days. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Richard Gayton filed a complaint against the United States Secretary of Labor on December 17, 2007, alleging discrimination, wrongful termination and constitutional violations arising from plaintiff's employment with the Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Doc #1. On August RICHARD GAYTON, Plaintiff, v HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, Defendant. / No C-07-6367 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

29, 2008, defendant moved to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6) all claims except those arising under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 USC §791. Doc #17. Plaintiff has not yet submitted his response to

defendant's motion to dismiss.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why defendant's motion to dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiff has fourteen days from

the date of this order to submit his written response to defendant's motion. If he fails submit a written response within

fourteen days, the court will grant Doc #17, defendant's motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

2